Time-Cost-Quality Trade-off in Project Scheduling with fuzzy quality

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ph.D. Candidate of Public Administration, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Iran.

Abstract

Project managers often face different and sometimes conflicting goals in optimizing project resources. In recent years, the demand of the project stakeholders to reduce the total cost of the project and reduce the time and increase its quality have intensified. Therefore, the balance of time, cost, and quality are the project's main goals. These topics lead researchers to develop models that add a quality factor to previous time balance models. This research provides a model for balancing cost, time and, quality, in discrete mode. Of course, since the quality factor is not a quantitative factor-like cost and time factors, and in the real world of projects, quality is a linguistic variable. It is obtained from the point of view of experts, so in this research, the quality of activities is shown as fuzzy numbers. By finding the optimal combination (time, cost, quality) of each activity, this model compresses the activities to reduce the costs of the whole project, while achieving the desired quality. A new metaheuristic algorithm called NHGA is introduced to solve the model, which has a much higher efficiency than GA to solve model, so with a case study, the efficiency of the proposed algorithm and the flexibility of the proposed model for project managers is shown

Keywords


  • Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M., & Harris, F. (1996). Construction delay analysis techniques. Construction Management & Economics14(5), 375-394.‏
  • Amiri, M., & Golozari, F. (2011). Application of fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in determining the critical path by using time, cost, risk, and quality criteria. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,54(1), 393-401.‏
  • Azaron, A., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2007). Multi-objective time–cost trade-off in dynamic PERT networks using an interactive approach. European Journal of Operational Research180(3), 1186-1200.‏
  • Babu, A. J. G., & Suresh, N. (1996). Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations. European journal of operational research88(2), 320-327.‏
  • Banihashemi, S. A., Khalilzadeh, M., Shahraki, A., Malkhalifeh, M. R., & Ahmadizadeh, S. S. R. (2021). Optimization of environmental impacts of construction projects: a time–cost–quality trade-off approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology18(3), 631-646.‏
  • Daisy, X.M. (2005 ). Applying parato ranking and niche formation to GA based multi objective time-cost optimization. Consr.Eng.Manage, 131(1): 81-91.
  • De, P., Dunne, E. J., Ghosh, J. B., & Wells, C. E. (1997). Complexity of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem for project networks. Operations research, 45(2), 302-306.‏
  • Effendi, Y. A., & Sarno, R. (2017, October). Non-linear optimization of critical path method. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)(pp. 90-96). IEEE.‏
  • Fulkerson, D. R. (1961). A network flow computation for project cost curves. Management science7(2), 167-178.‏
  • Isikyildiz, S., & Akcay, C. (2020). Multi-objective optimization of time-cost-quality in construction projects using genetic algorithm. Revista de la construcción19(3), 335-346.‏
  • Jeunet, J., & Orm, M. B. (2020). Optimizing temporary work and overtime in the Time Cost Quality Trade-off Problem. European Journal of Operational Research284(2), 743-761.‏
  • Kapur, K. C. (1973). An algorithm for project cost-duration analysis problem with quadratic and convex cost functions. AIIE Transactions5(4), 314-322.‏
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.‏
  • Kurij, K. V., Milajić, A. V., & Beljaković, D. D. (2014). Analysis of construction dynamic plan using fuzzy critical path method. Tehnika69(2), 209-215.‏
  • Liu, G. Y., Lee, E. W. M., & Yuen, R. K. K. (2020). Optimising the time-cost-quality (TCQ) trade-off in offshore wind farm project management with a genetic algorithm (GA). HKIE Transactions,27(1), 1-12.‏
  • Lotfi, R., Yadegari, Z., Hosseini, S. H., Khameneh, A. H., Tirkolaee, E. B., & Weber, G. W. (2020). A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization.
  • Luong, D.-L., Tran, D.-H., & Nguyen, P. T. (2018). Optimizing multi-mode time-cost-quality trade-off of construction project using opposition multiple objective difference evolution. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–13.
  • Moder, J.J., Phillips, C.R., Davis, E.W. (1983). Project Management with CPM, PERT and precedence diagramming. third ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  • Olivieri, H., Seppänen, O., Alves, T. D. C., Scala, N. M., Schiavone, V., Liu, M., & Granja, A. D. (2019). Survey comparing critical path method, last planner system, and location-based techniques. Journal of construction engineering and management145(12), 04019077.
  • (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK Guide. 5th ed. USA: Project Management Institute Inc.
  • Sonmez, R., & Bettemir, Ö. H. (2012). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the discrete time–cost trade-off problem. Expert Systems with Applications39(13), 11428-11434.‏
  • Taheri Amiri, M. J., Haghighi, F. R., Eshtehardian, E., & Abessi, O. (2017). Optimization of Time, Cost, and Quality in Critical Chain Method Using Simulated Annealing (RESEARCH NOTE). International Journal of Engineering30(5), 627-635.‏
  • Tareghian, H. R., & Taheri, S. H. (2007). A solution procedure for the discrete time, cost and quality tradeoff problem using electromagnetic scatter search. Applied mathematics and computation190(2), 1136-1145.‏
  • Zheng, D. X., Ng, S. T., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004). Applying a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective approach for time-cost optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and management130(2), 168-176.