Fuzzy Systems and its Applications

Fuzzy Systems and its Applications

Fuzzy Evaluation of Digital Accounting System Requirements Assessment Mechanisms in the Context of Capital Market Companies: Fuzzy Logic of TODIM

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Accounting, QO.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2 Department of Accountingq ,Q0.C, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
3 Department of Accounting, BG.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran
10.22034/jfsa.2025.544034.1282
Abstract
The passage of time and digital developments in business communications paved the way for the emergence of more modern accounting methods in the context of information networks, which emerged from the transition from the third generation to the fourth generation, digital accounting. The purpose of this research is fuzzy evaluation of digital accounting system needs assessment mechanisms in the context of capital market companies. This study is mixed in methodology and based on an exploratory and interpretive nature. It implemented the study objectives with the participation of a group of experts in the qualitative phase and financial and accounting managers of capital market companies in the quantitative phase. This study is mixed in methodology and based on an exploratory and interpretive nature, which was completed with the participation of a group of experts in the qualitative phase and financial and accounting managers of capital market companies in the quantitative phase. In terms of analytical processes, this study uses Grand Theory and Delphi in the qualitative part to identify the central dimensions of the digital accounting system needs assessment mechanisms and determine their reliability. In the quantitative part of the study, it also uses fuzzy logic to evaluate the identified central aspects of the phenomenon under study in the context of capital market companies. The results of the qualitative study, after conducting 14 interviews and emerging 282 open codes, indicate the determination of 33 conceptual themes, 6 central components, and 3 structural categories, which, in a 6-dimensional theoretical model, represent the theoretical framework of the study phenomenon. In the quantitative part, the results showed that system mechanisms related to profitability (X5) are the most important background that should be considered in the software aspects of digital accounting development. The obtained results show that digital accounting systems, in order to reach a more efficient point of financial utilization by companies, need to pay attention to the prerequisites of profitable systems so that they can realize a higher level of stakeholders' demands in terms of meeting the expectations and computational needs of companies' financial performance.
Keywords
Subjects

[8]    Agyei-Boapeah, H., Evans, R. and Nisar, T, M. (2022). Disruptive innovation: Designing business platforms for new financial services, Journal of Business Research, 150(2):    134-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.066
[9]    Alsharari, N.M. and Ikem, F. (2023). Digital accounting systems and information technology in the public sector: mutual interaction, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 25(1): 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-09-2021-0190
[10]    Antonini, C. (2024). Accounting digitalization in the quest for environmental sustainability,  Current  Opinion  in  Environmental  Sustainability,  66(1):   83-105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101399
[11]    Assidi, S., Omran, M., Rana, T. and Borgi, H. (2025). The role of AI adoption in transforming the accounting profession: a diffusion of innovations theory approach, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-04- 2024-0124
[12]    Ayabei, W., Makokha, A, N. and Malenya, A. (2023). Effect of Quickbooks Systems on Ғinancial Рerformance Among The Small And Medium Enterprises In Bungoma County, Kenya, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science, 11(6): 467-482.
[13]    Aydoğan, B., Olgun, M., Smarandache, F. and Ünver, M. (2024). A Decision-Making Approach Incorporating TODIM Method and Sine Entropy in q-Rung Picture Fuzzy Set Setting, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2(3): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3798588
[14]    Berger, A, N. and Boot, A, W, A. (2024). Financial intermediation services and competition analyses: Review and paths forward for improvement, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 57(2): 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2024.101072
 
[15]    Bian, W. (2024). Research on the Role of Accounting Information Disclosure and Corporate Governance Structure in Protecting Shareholders’ Rights and Interests, Transactions on Economics Business and Management Research, 5(2): 321-327. https://doi.org/10.62051/3rc2yk78
[16]    Carè, R., Boitan, I, A., Maria Stoian, A. and Fatima, R. (2025). Exploring the landscape of financial inclusion through the lens of financial technologies: A review, Finance Research Letters, 72(3): 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106500
[17]    Cochoy, F., Hagberg, J., McIntyre, M.P. and SöRum, N. (2017). Digitalizing consumption: intro- duction, in Cochoy, F., Hagberg, J., Sörum, N. and McIntyre, M.P. (Eds), Digitalizing Consumption: How Devices Shape Consumer Culture, Routledge, London, pp. 1-19.
[18]    Dethier, E., Kern, D, R., Stevens, G. and Boden, A. (2024). Making Order in Household Accounting - Digital Invoices as Domestic Work Artifacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 3(2): 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09495-w
[19]    Gao, X. (2024). Unlocking the path to digital financial accounting: A study on Chinese SMEs and startups, Global Finance Journal, 61(2): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100970
[20]    Glaser, B. G. (1992). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif.: Sociology Press.
[21]    Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Lima, M. M. P. P. (1992). TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16(4): 113-127
[22]    Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N. (1992). Qualitative Research and Psychological Theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(2): 97-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x
[23]    Jans, M., Aysolmaz, B., Corten, M., Joshi, A. and van Peteghem, M. (2023). Digitalization in accounting–Warmly embraced or coldly ignored?, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(9): 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-4998
[24]    Jemine, G., Puyou, F.-R. and Bouvet, F. (2024). Technological innovation and the co-production of accounting services in small accounting firms, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(1): 280-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2022-5981
[25]    Krohling, R. A., & de Souza, T. T. (2012). Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi- criteria decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(13): 11487-11493.
[26]    Laili, N, H., Khairi, Kh, F. and Masruki, R. (2023). An Analysis of the Use of Accounting System on Cloud: A Case Study in Malaysia, In: Hamdan, A., Harraf, A., Buallay, A., Arora, P., Alsabatin, H. (eds) From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 470. Springer, Cham. 999-1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28314-7_84
 
[27]    Lin, M., Wang, H. & Xu, Z. (2020). TODIM-based multi-criteria decision-making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(3): 3647–3671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09774-9
[28]    Llamazares, B. (2018). An analysis of the generalized TODIM method, European Journal of Operational Research, 269(3): 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.054
[29]    Lombardi, R. and Secundo, G. (2020). The digital transformation of corporate reporting: a systematic literature review and avenues for future research, Meditari Accountancy Research, Forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2020-0870
[30]    Loo, I, D., Bots, J. (2018). The life of an accounting information systems research course, Accounting Education, 27(4): 358-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1471726
[31]    Manojkumar Nair,  S. (2025). Evolving Managerial Accounting Practices in Response to Digital Transformation, Accounting for Managerial Decision, 3(2):  183-208.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5155265
[32]    Napisah, L, S., Taufikurochman, C., Harto, B. (2024). The Effect of Digitalization on the Sustain- ability of Accounting Practices in the Financial Industry, Journal of Social Science and Business Studies, 2(4): 268-276. https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v2i4.100
[33]    Naser, K. (1993). Creative Financial Accounting: Its Nature and Use, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
[34]    Osuma, G. (2025). The impact of financial inclusion on poverty reduction and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative study of digital financial services, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11(2): 36-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101263
[35]    Qatawneh, A.M. and Makhlouf, M.H. (2023). Influence of smart mobile banking services on senior banks’ clients intention to use: moderating role of digital accounting, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2023-0018
[36]    Quang Huy, Ph. and Phuc, V, K. (2024). Insight into the impact of digital accounting information system on sustainable innovation ecosystem, Sustainable Futures, 8(2): 45-67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100377
[37]    Said, Y. and Aliu, A. (2022). The Influence of Accounting Software in Achieving The International Accounting Standard Boards Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Information, International Journal of Advanced Research, 10(2): 26-38. https://www.journalijar.com/article/42047/the- influence-of-accounting-software-in-achieving-the-internationalaccounting-standard-boards- qualitative-characteristics-of-financial-information/
[38]    Shawnteeonia, L., Carmen, G., Fawn, W., Chery, R. and Terrai, R. (2022). Accounting System Features: Usage for Different Types of Businesses, International Journal of Recent Research Aspects, 3(4): 110-134.
 
[39]    Valentinetti, D. and Rea, M.A. (2024). Factors influencing the digitalization of sustainability ac- counting, reporting and disclosure: a systematic literature review, Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2024-2385
[40]    Wu, Ch, H. and Pambudi, P, D. L. (2024). Digital transformation in fintech: Choosing between application and Software as a Service (SaaS), Asia Pacific Management Review, 1(1): 110-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.12.006
[41]    Yaftian, A., Mirshekary, S. and Mihret, D.G. (2017). Learning commercial computerized accounting programmes: Perceptions and motivations, Accounting Research Journal, 30(3): 312-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2015-0107
Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 17
Open Access Statement
December 2025
Pages 127-164

  • Receive Date 29 August 2025
  • Revise Date 11 November 2025
  • Accept Date 25 December 2025